Recruitment and Retention R3

Recruitment, Retention, and Reactivation (R3)

The importance of hunters, anglers, sport shooters, and archers goes beyond the simple imperative of keeping alive these venerated American traditions; each year, participants in the four activities, through their purchases of licenses and sporting equipment, contribute hundreds of millions of dollars in essential funding for fish and wildlife conservation, including species recovery, habitat improvements, and other critical work carried out by agencies and organizations across the country. Any decline in hunting, fishing, sport shooting, and archery would directly translate into diminished funding and material support for fish and wildlife management activities that benefit all Americans.

As a result, the need for organized and data-driven recruitment, retention, and reactivation efforts (collectively known as “R3”)—including programs, outreach initiatives, and other strategies to recruit, retain, and reactivate sportsmen and women—has never been more important.

Current trends in hunting, fishing, sport shooting, and archery reinforce the need for concerted and ongoing R3 initiatives. Perhaps the greatest challenge for R3 specialists will be to stem the decline in hunting participation, which has been continuing fairly consistently since the early 1980s. The trend regarding fishing is similar, with most data sources indicating a long-term and gradual decline in participation. (It should be noted that a few sources paint a marginally more optimistic picture for fishing, showing instead a generally flat trend line in participation.)

Sport shooting and archery, on the other hand, appear to be on the rise. With many data sources suggesting recent gains in sport shooting and archery participation, the challenge regarding these activities is different but equally important: keep up the momentum by ensuring that the upward trend continues.

While efforts to ensure healthy participation in hunting, fishing, sport shooting, and archery have long been a priority for fish and wildlife agencies and others in the conservation community, the past decade has seen a marked increase not only in R3 implementation but also in the science of how to plan and develop R3 initiatives in the most effective ways. Evidence of the growing consideration given to R3 efforts can be seen in the shift from the original widely used phrase “recruitment and retention” (or “R&R”) to “R3,” with the latter term now encompassing “reactivation” efforts targeting individuals who have lapsed out of the activities. This explicit broadening of focus suggests that agencies, organizations, and industry groups are increasingly segmenting and targeting their efforts in more deliberate ways.

The growing prominence of R3 objectives within agency priorities, including recognition of the need to coordinate initiatives in a methodical and scientific manner, has culminated in the recent development of a national R3 plan by the Council to Advance Hunting and the Shooting Sports and the Wildlife Management Institute. To complement this plan, Responsive Management recently produced Hunting, Fishing, Sport Shooting, and Archery Recruitment, Retention, and Reactivation: A Practitioner’s Guide, a resource of the most essential and up-to-date R3 research findings.

Responsive Management’s recent R3 projects include the following:

  • Hunting, Fishing, Sport Shooting, and Archery Recruitment, Retention, and Reactivation: A Practitioner’s Guide: The handbook summarizes in a single volume the most essential and up-to-date research pertaining to hunting, fishing, sport shooting, and archery recruitment, retention, and reactivation efforts. The handbook fills the need for a single volume that provides easily understood, up-to-date information on the best ways to recruit new sportsmen and retain or reactive lapsed and casual participants. The handbook offers meaningful context and real-world utility for the R3 data produced over the last decade—by synthesizing this data to provide applications for program planning, implementation, and continued evaluation, the handbook acts as the “go to” resource for readers ranging from agency division directors and R3 specialists to the staff of conservation organizations and outdoor recreation educators.
  • Longitudinal Evaluation of Hunting, Fishing, and Shooting Recruitment and Retention Programs: This study examined the effectiveness of recruitment and retention programs through surveys administered to participants prior to and several months following their participation in the program. The researchers conducted a comparison of the results from the two surveys, both of which were administered by telephone to participants who had pre-registered for the programs. A follow-up phase of the study entailed additional surveys administered a year or more following completion of a program. This study examined 69 different programs (some programs pertained to a single state while others were multi-state).
  • An Assessment of the Texas Outdoor Adventures Education Program: Responsive Management assisted the Dallas Ecological Foundation in developing an assessment tool for measuring the outcomes and success of the Outdoor Adventures Education Program. Responsive Management then conducted the survey to assess students’ interest and participation in outdoor recreation activities, attitudes toward wildlife and habitat conservation, and satisfaction with specific program elements and content.
  • An Evaluation of the National Fishing in Schools Program: This evaluation entailed a web-based survey of student program participants as well as National Fishing in Schools Program instructors.
  • An Assessment and Evaluation of the National Archery in the Schools Program: Responsive Management conducted a multi-phase assessment of the National Archery in the Schools Program (NASP) by examining the effects of the NASP on student performance in ten participating states. The purpose of this study was to determine the program’s effect on school attendance, academic performance, and self-esteem and achievements.
  • Recruiting and Retaining Nontraditional Adult Participants into Fishing and Hunting Through Targeted Marketing, Instruction, Mentoring, and Social Reinforcement: This research was conducted for the Southeastern Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies’ Committee on Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife-Related Participation and the Midwestern Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies’ Recruitment and Retention Committee to evaluate the outcomes of a series of pilot programs designed to promote hunting and fishing among young adults in urban/suburban settings who are interested in locally grown or organic foods (commonly known as “locavores”). Over a two-year period, hands-on pilot hunting and fishing programs were offered in Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Participant surveys were administered before and after the programs (in some cases, a third survey was administered following the hunting or fishing season). In addition, surveys were administered to program instructors and mentors who conducted or assisted with the programs.
  • Increasing the Number of Hunter Education Graduates Who Purchase Hunting Licenses: This study was conducted under a grant from the National Shooting Sports Foundation to assess the best ways of encouraging and assisting hunter education graduates to become regular hunters and license purchasers. Accordingly, the rates at which hunter education students go on to purchase hunting licenses and hunt during the season following their course were two primary indicators examined in the research. The study entailed pre- and post-hunter education course telephone surveys of students in Alabama, Georgia, and Kentucky, as well as a series of focus groups with hunter education students in each of the three aforementioned states.
  • Evaluating Apprentice Licenses as a Hunter Recruitment Strategy: This study was conducted under a grant from the National Shooting Sports Foundation to determine the extent to which apprentice hunting licenses (i.e., licenses intended for new hunters to be able to try the sport without first having to complete hunter education requirements) act as a recruitment tool for creating new active hunters. The rates at which apprentice license holders go on to enroll in hunter education and/or purchase regular hunting licenses were two primary indicators examined in the research. The study entailed a telephone survey of apprentice license holders in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Virginia, as well as a series of focus groups with license holders in each of the five aforementioned states.
  • Identifying Sportfishing’s Competition to Improve Angler Recruitment and Retention: This study was conducted for the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, in conjunction with the American Sportfishing Association, to identify and assess sportfishing’s competition—in other words, to explore why some anglers do not fish every year and what they do when they are not fishing. The study entailed a series of eight focus groups conducted with active anglers and lapsed/ex-anglers in Tampa, Florida, Harrisonburg, Virginia, and Portland, Oregon, and a telephone survey of anglers.
  • The Future of Hunting and the Shooting Sports—Research-Based Recruitment and Retention Strategies: The purpose of this study was to better understand the factors related to hunting and sport shooting participation, identify strategies to better meet the needs of current and potential participants, and more effectively communicate to the public about these activities. The study included a comprehensive literature review of past research; focus groups in diverse geographic areas of active hunters and shooters, lapsed hunters and shooters, non-hunters and non-shooters, and anti-hunters and anti-shooters; two nationwide telephone surveys with hunters and shooters and the general population; and final report, including actionable recommendation strategies.
  • The Effects of Mandatory Basic Hunter Education and Advanced Hunter Training on Hunter Recruitment and Retention: Responsive Management conducted focus groups, telephone surveys, and a multiple regression analysis to determine the impacts of mandatory basic hunter education and advanced hunter training on hunter satisfaction, recruitment, and retention.